Valve has restored Counter-Strike: Global Offensive as a standalone listing on Steam, giving players direct access to the older version of the game after it was replaced by Counter-Strike 2 in 2023. The return was not formally announced and the page remains difficult to find without a direct link, suggesting Valve is not positioning it as a full relaunch.
The version available is also limited. There is no official matchmaking, and players are instead relying on community servers through the browser to play online. That makes the release feel more like a legacy build being made accessible again rather than a supported live product.
At the same time, Valve has made its stance on esports clear. It confirmed that tournament organizers will not be granted licenses to run CS:GO events, even after the game’s return to Steam.
That decision draws a hard line between accessibility and competition. Players can revisit CS:GO, but any organized, sanctioned esports activity remains tied to Counter-Strike 2. Valve has continued to allow licenses for older titles like Counter-Strike 1.6 and Source, which makes the exclusion of CS:GO a deliberate choice rather than a blanket policy.
The likely reasoning is straightforward. Running two active competitive versions of Counter-Strike at the same time would split players, teams, and viewership across both games.
CS2 has already replaced CS:GO at the top level, including Valve-sponsored Majors, which now operate exclusively in the newer version.
Allowing tournament organizers to run CS:GO events again would create a parallel ecosystem built around a game Valve no longer develops. By refusing licenses, Valve is keeping all competitive attention focused on CS2, even if part of the player base still prefers the older version.
The reappearance of CS:GO has already drawn significant interest. Reports around the relaunch point to tens of thousands of players returning shortly after it became accessible again, showing that demand for the older version never fully disappeared.
That interest explains why Valve chose to make the game playable again at all. Players who preferred CS:GO’s feel, maps, or mechanics now have a way to return without relying on hidden legacy builds or unofficial workarounds.
But the restrictions attached to that return show the limits of that support. Valve is willing to preserve access, but not to reopen the competitive ecosystem around it.
The result is a clear split in how Valve is treating its own games. CS:GO is now positioned as a legacy experience that players can revisit, while CS2 remains the only version tied to official competition and long-term development.
That distinction matters for the future of Counter-Strike. It allows Valve to acknowledge the older game’s popularity without undermining the ecosystem it is building around CS2.
For players, it creates a choice between familiarity and relevance. For teams and tournament organizers, the decision is already made.
